Criteria for confidence in epigenetic clock results in intervention studies (title not verified; DOI 10.1111/acel.70756)
Per a secondary summary, extending previously published single-clock intervention studies to additional clock models produced no additional significant results; three criteria for higher-confidence clock findings are proposed. Journal inferred from DOI prefix (Aging Cell).
Evidence
5/10
Emerging Evidence
Sample
—
subjects
Duration
—
study period
Journal
Aging Cell (inferred from DOI prefix; verify)
Oct 2026
Key Findings
- 01
No additional clocks reached significance when single-clock intervention studies were extended to more clock models
- 02
Higher confidence when reliable PC-based clocks respond
- 03
Higher confidence when mortality-trained or pace-of-aging clocks respond
- 04
Higher confidence when multiple clocks move in the same direction
Structured Methods
- Study Design
- methodological_analysis
- Sample Size
- Not reported
- Study Duration
- Not reported
- Methodology
- Re-analysis of published intervention datasets, positive-control datasets and simulation
- Limitations
- Title, authors, sample sizes and exact publication date were not verified (primary page not accessible; details from a secondary summary); publication_date is approximate.
Citations & References
Unknown authors (2026). Criteria for confidence in epigenetic clock results in intervention studies (title not verified; DOI 10.1111/acel.70756). Aging Cell (inferred from DOI prefix; verify).
Source
Publisher
Journal
Aging Cell (inferred from DOI prefix; verify)
Sample member
Longevity Operator
One number for your longevity journey.
FICO for credit. PHS for longevity. Eight biological domains collapsed into one provable score — intuitive at a glance, rigorous underneath.
- Metabolic
- Hormonal
- Cardiovascular
- Brain / Cognitive
- Sleep
- Musculoskeletal
- Gut
- Immunity / Inflammation
