All Research
    PAPER DNAM-CCohort Study2026

    How epigenetic clocks tick: unpacking the black box by deciphering biological pathways and transcriptomic signatures of accelerated aging

    Arpawong, Crimmins and colleagues paired DNA methylation with contemporaneous RNA-seq in 3,227 US Health and Retirement Study participants and ran differential expression against age acceleration for the five most widely used clocks (Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, GrimAge, DunedinPACE). The enriched pathways behind each clock were largely non-overlapping - the clocks are not noisy estimates of one latent construct. Transcriptomic aging gene scores (TAGS) derived from those signatures complemented and, in several cases, outperformed the DNAm clocks for association with age-related morbidity and mortality.

    Evidence

    7/10

    Moderate Evidence

    Sample

    3,227

    subjects

    Duration

    study period

    Journal

    npj Aging

    Jul 2026

    Authors

    Authorship

    Thalida Em Arpawong, Steve Cole, Harshanna Badhesha, Jung Ki Kim, Christopher R. Beam, Eric T. Klopack, Kimberly Siegmund, Bharat Thyagarajan, Eileen M. Crimmins

    02

    Key Findings

    1. 01

      n = 3,227 HRS participants with paired DNA methylation and RNA-sequencing

    2. 02

      The five canonical clocks showed more unique than shared enriched biological pathways

    3. 03

      Clock-specific signatures spanned immune activity, metabolism, cell growth and signalling

    4. 04

      Derived transcriptomic aging gene scores (TAGS) sometimes outperformed the DNAm clocks for morbidity and mortality association

    5. 05

      Implies a single reported "biological age" number conceals which clock, and therefore which biology, produced it

    03

    Structured Methods

    Study Design
    Cohort Study
    Sample Size
    3,227 subjects
    Study Duration
    Not reported
    Methodology
    Cross-sectional differential gene expression analysis against epigenetic age acceleration in a nationally representative US cohort with contemporaneous DNAm and RNA-seq, followed by derivation and phenotype-association testing of transcriptomic aging gene scores.
    Limitations
    Cross-sectional design; blood tissue only, so tissue-specific aging is not captured. Published as an unedited accepted manuscript pending final editing. TAGS are newly derived and await external validation.
    04

    Citations & References

    Cite this paper

    Thalida Em Arpawong, Steve Cole, Harshanna Badhesha, Jung Ki Kim, Christopher R. Beam, Eric T. Klopack, et al. (2026). How epigenetic clocks tick: unpacking the black box by deciphering biological pathways and transcriptomic signatures of accelerated aging. npj Aging. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-026-00446-x

    05

    Indexing

    Topics

    epigenetic clocksbiological ageDNA methylationtranscriptomicsbiomarkersHRS

    Interventions

    biological-age-testing
    PHS
    671
    / 1000
    T3
    Longevity Operator

    Sample member

    Longevity Operator

    The Peak Human Score · PHS v1

    One number for your longevity journey.

    FICO for credit. PHS for longevity. Eight biological domains collapsed into one provable score — intuitive at a glance, rigorous underneath.

    • Metabolic
    • Hormonal
    • Cardiovascular
    • Brain / Cognitive
    • Sleep
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Gut
    • Immunity / Inflammation