Sex-specific biological aging clocks across organs and omics
Thirty-eight sex-stratified biological aging clocks across 15 organ systems show that organ-specific aging liability, its genetic architecture and its links to cardiometabolic, endocrine and mental traits differ between women and men. Sex-stratified training is what makes a sex-appropriate healthy normative reference possible. The clocks predicted systemic disease and all-cause mortality in a sex- and organ-dependent manner, and the brain clock showed sex-dependent associations with cognitive decline inside a preclinical Alzheimer trial. The authors are explicit that sex-pooled and sex-interaction approaches remain valuable.
Evidence
7/10
Moderate Evidence
Sample
—
subjects
Duration
Longitudinal survival follow-up across contributing cohorts
study period
Journal
Nature Medicine
Sep 2026
Full Abstract
Sex differentially shapes aging, neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, yet most biological aging clocks were trained on sex-pooled samples and implicitly assume sex invariance. The authors developed 38 sex-specific biological aging clocks across 15 organ systems, demonstrating the importance of sex-stratified training for constructing sex-specific healthy normative references and revealing marked divergence between female and male clocks. Genetic parameters and Mendelian randomization indicate that organ-specific aging liability and its relationships to cardiometabolic, endocrine and mental traits are configured differently in females and males. Proteomic analyses identify distinct, organ-resolved synaptic, immune, vascular and metabolic networks. In longitudinal survival analyses, sex-specific clocks predict systemic disease and all-cause mortality in a sex-dependent and organ-dependent manner, and reveal sex-dependent associations between the brain aging clock and cognitive decline trajectory during a preclinical Alzheimer disease clinical trial.
Key Findings
- 01
38 sex-specific biological aging clocks developed across 15 organ systems
- 02
Sex-stratified training is required to build sex-appropriate healthy normative references
- 03
Mendelian randomization shows organ-specific aging liability is configured differently in females and males
- 04
Proteomics identifies distinct organ-resolved synaptic, immune, vascular and metabolic networks by sex
- 05
Clocks predict systemic disease and all-cause mortality in a sex- and organ-dependent manner
- 06
Brain aging clock shows sex-dependent association with cognitive decline trajectory in a preclinical AD trial
Structured Methods
- Study Design
- Cohort Study
- Sample Size
- Not reported
- Study Duration
- Longitudinal survival follow-up across contributing cohorts
- Methodology
- Development of 38 sex-stratified AI-based biological aging clocks (predicted age minus chronological age) spanning 15 organ systems, with genetic parameter estimation, Mendelian randomization, organ-resolved proteomic network analysis and longitudinal survival analysis; validated against cognitive decline trajectory in a preclinical Alzheimer disease clinical trial.
- Limitations
- Observational; the clocks are risk-stratification tools, not validated intervention endpoints. Normative references are cohort-specific and may not transfer to other populations. Not a clinically available test. The authors note sex-pooled and sex-interaction models retain value, so this does not invalidate existing pooled clocks - it shows they obscure sex-dependent signal.
Citations & References
Z. Song, D. Feng, N. A. Rahman, M. R. Duggan, Q. Tian, J. Zeng, et al. (2026). Sex-specific biological aging clocks across organs and omics. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04662-6
Sample member
Longevity Operator
One number for your longevity journey.
FICO for credit. PHS for longevity. Eight biological domains collapsed into one provable score — intuitive at a glance, rigorous underneath.
- Metabolic
- Hormonal
- Cardiovascular
- Brain / Cognitive
- Sleep
- Musculoskeletal
- Gut
- Immunity / Inflammation
